Technological challenges and solutions for the development of CCUS
the relevant role of the subsea area in the integrity of CO2storage facilities in front of PL 1425/2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70369/few41r50Keywords:
Monitoring, ESG, Energy transition, Legal aspects, Law projectAbstract
CCUS technology increasingly appears capable of meeting expectations related to the transition to the Net-Zero world. However, for CCUS to be successful, one of the most critical steps – monitoring – must be carried out to meet several guidelines. Therefore, the objective of this article is to verify what technological challenges the O&G industry faces in developing CCUS safely and responsibly, reinforcing its market positioning within the scope of ESG. Alternatives, solutions and opportunities will then be proposed to encourage such development. Furthermore, the relevant role of the subsea area in the integrity of CO2 storage facilities will be discussed in light of PL (Law Project) 1,425/2022 – under analysis in the National Congress – and the industry’s challenges in adapting to the PL’s new and future guidelines regulations. The work includes an integrative and systematic literature review and the theoretical references and guidelines that inspired several excerpts of the PL, as the author of this article is one of the formulators of Law Project 1,425/2022. Studies have shown that the entire O&G industry value chain can benefit from the energy transition, including using technologies such as CCUS. However, to achieve the expected results, especially within the scope of ESG, there are still paths to be followed, especially in the subsea area, including the development of monitoring technologies for CO2 storage facilities in the subsea area.
References
ABNT. NBR ISO 31000: gestão de riscos – princípios e diretrizes. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT, 2009. Disponível em: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4656830/mod_resource/content/1/ISO31000.pdf. Acesso em: 14 fev. 2023.
ALVES, D. Sequestro e armazenamento de CO2: aplicação da tecnologia em Portugal. 2008. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia do Ambiente) - Universidade de Aveiro, Aveiro, 2008. Disponível em: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://ria.ua.pt/bitstream/10773/605/1/2009000616.pdf&v=d=2ahUKEwj1iaaNoIaFAxXsqZUCHYziB3gQFnoECBoQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2xz24j4nYUavxyly2v0QP0. Acesso em: 14 fev. 2023.
ANYOSA, S.; BUNTING, S.; EIDSVIK, J.; ROMDHANE, A.; BERGMO, P. Assessing the value of seismic monitoring of CO2 storage using simulations and statistical analysis. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, [s. l.], v. 105, 103219, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103219. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103219. Acesso em: 13 fev. 2023.
ASL, H.F.; ITAOKA, K.; CHAPMAN, A.; KATO, E.; KUROSAWA, A. Key factors for achieving emission reduction goals cognizant of CCS. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, [s. l.], v. 99, 103097, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103097. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103097. Acesso em: 13 fev. 2023.
BLACKFORD, J.; WIDDICOMBE, S.; LOWE, D.; CHEN, B. Environmental risks and performance assessment of carbon dioxide (CO2) leakage in marine ecosystems. In: MAROTO-VALER, M. Mercedes (Ed.). Developments and Innovation in Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Capture and Storage Technology: v 2 Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Storage and Utilisation. Sawston: Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy, 2010. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9781845697976500138?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 14 fev. 2023.
DEAN, M.; TUCKER, O. A risk-based framework for measurement, monitoring and verification (MMV) of the goldeneye storage complex for the Peterhead CCS project, UK. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, [s. l.], v. 61, p. 1–15, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.03.014. Acesso em: 05 mar. 2023.
DIXON, T.; ROMANAK, K.D. Improving monitoring protocols for CO2 geological storage with technical advances in CO2 attribution monitoring. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, v. 41, n. 1, p. 29–40, 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.029. Acesso em: 14 fev. 2023.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY. Best practices for: monitoring, verification, and accounting of CO2 storage in deep geologic formations. DOE, 2009. Disponível em: https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/archive/hub/publications/159708/best-practices-monitoringverification-accounting-CO2-stored-deep-geologic-formations.pdf. Acesso em: 05 fev. 2023.
EGMOND, V.; BROUWER, J. H.; HEIMERIKS, G. J.; HEKKERT, M. P. Overview and analysis of the Dutch CCS program as a knowledge network. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, [s. l.], v. 11, supp., p. S1-S9, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.11.004. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583612002563?via%3Dihub. Acesso em: 05 fev. 2023.
EY. Does Your Nonfinancial Reporting Tell Your Value Creations Story? 1 Jan. 2018. Disponível em: https://www.ey.com/en_gl/assurance/does-nonfinancial-reporting-tellvalue-creation-story. Acesso em: 05 fev. 2023.
GASPAR, Hugo Alexandre Curado. Captura e armazenamento de CO2. 2014. Dissertação (Mestrado em Energia e Bioenergia) - Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, 2014. Disponível em: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://run.unl.pt/handle/10362/12397&ved=2ahUKEwimwfjFoIaFAxVSkZUCHXIcCjwQFnoECA4QAQ&usg=AOvVaw183-TLb1yXPgoXMXd7lNf-. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2023.
GLOBAL CCS INSTITUTE. The global status of CCS 2020. Docklands, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Global-Status-of-CCSReportEnglish.pdf. Acesso em: 14 fev. 2023.
GLOBAL CCS INSTITUTE. The Global Status of CCS 2021. Docklands, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/resources/global-status-report/download/. Acesso em: 14 fev. 2023.
HARBERT, W.; DALEY, T. M.; BROMHAL, G.; SULLIVAN, C.; HUANG, L. Progress in monitoring strategies for risk reduction in geologic CO2 storage. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, [s. l.], v. 51, n. 1, p. 260–275, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.05.007. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2023.
IEA. Carbon Capture and Storage- Model Regulatory Framework. Paris, 1 jan. 2010. Disponível em: https://www.iea.org/reports/carbon-capture-and-storage-model-regulatory-framework. Acesso em: 05 mar. 2023.
IEAGHG. Review of offshore monitoring for CCS projects. Cheltenham, 1 Jul. 2015. Disponível em: https://ieaghg.org/docs/General_Docs/Reports/2015-02.pdf. Acesso em: 01 abr.2023.
IEAGHG. Funds research into the development and deployment of carbon capture and storage (ccs) Technologies. Cheltenham, 1 Jan. 2021. Disponível em: https://ieaghg.org/2-uncategorised/267-ipac-report. Acesso em: 05 mar. 2023.
IPCC. Diretrizes para inventários nacionais de gases de efeito estufa. Brasília, DF, 1 jan. 2006. Disponível em: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://antigo.mctic.gov.br/mctic/opencms/ciencia/SEPED/clima/ciencia_do_clima/painel_intergovernamental_sobre_mudanca_do_clima.html&ved=2ahUKEwiambX0pYaFAxUFrpUCHZ5jC4AQFnoECBgQAQ&. Acesso em: 05 mar. 2023.
JENKINS, C.; CHADWICK, A.; HOVORKA, S.D. The state of the art in monitoring and verification—Ten years on. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, [s. l.], v. 40, n. 1, p. 312–349, 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.009. Acesso em: 01abr. 2023.
KANAMURA, T. Risk Mitigation and Return Resilience for High Yield Bond ETFs with ESG Components. Finance Research Letters, [s. l.], v. 41, n. 1, 101866, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101866. Acesso em: 12 jan.2023.
KETZER, J. M. M. et al. (org.). Atlas brasileiro de captura e armazenamento geológico de CO2. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.globalccsinstitute.com/archive/hub/publications/202033/atlasbrasileiro.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwicvpnvoIaFAxUGqZUCHfKfCAIQFnoECA8QAQ&usg=AOvVaw2sQX8eucQrR9WoqX7PRAmZ. Acesso em: 06 mar.2023.
MACHADO, Nayara. Entenda o marco legal da captura e armazenamento de carbono. Eixos, 12 jun. 2023a. Disponível em: https://epbr.com.br/entenda-o-marco-legal-da-captura-e-armazenamentode-carbono/. Acesso em: 06 mar. 2023.
MACHADO, Nayara. PL de captura e armazenamento de carbono abre caminhos para indústria de etanol. Eixos, 06 jun. 2023b. Disponível em: https://epbr.com.br/pl-de-captura-e-armazenamentode-carbono-abrecaminhos-para-industria-de-etanol/. Acesso em: 01 abr. 2023.
MORBACH, I. (2024, January 1). Os desafios tecnológicos e soluções para o desenvolvimento do CCUS: o papel relevante da área submarina na integridade das instalações de armazenamento de CO2 frente ao PL 1425/2022. Entrevista. n/a
NUNES, R.C.; COSTA, H.K.M. Aspectos jurídicos da captura e armazenamento de carbono. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, (2019).
VARELA, C.A.; MILONE, D. A Resposta do mercado aos Acidentes Ambientais na Indústria Petrolífera: Estudo do Caso do Desastre no Golfo do México. In: ENCONTRO INTERNACIONAL SOBRE GESTÃO EMPRESARIAL E MEIO AMBIENTE, 16., 2014. Anais eletrônicos [...]. São Paulo: DEA/USP, 2014. Disponível em: https://www.engema.org.br/XVIENGEMA/148.pdf. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2023.
WAARUM, I.K.; BLOMBERG, A.E.A.; EEK, E. CCS Leakage Detection Technology - Industry Needs, Government Regulations, and Sensor Performance. Energy Procedia, [s. l.], v. 114, p. 3613–3627, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1493. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2023.
WRI. CCS Guidelines. WRI – WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE. Washington, 2008.Disponível em: https://files.wri.org/d8/s3fs-public/pdf/ccs_guidelines.pdf. Acesso em: 15 fev. 2023.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Romario de Carvalho Nunes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
