Case studies of clustering of decommissioning activities for subsea systems with manifolds

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70369/a9z2xw30

Keywords:

Clustering, Manifold, Pipelines

Abstract

The decommissioning of subsea systems in mature offshore fields represents a critical and complex stage, requiring rigorous technical planning, integrated risk management, and environmental compliance. Carrying out decommissioning immediately after production shutdown (late life stage) tends to present lower complexity and cost. In particular, wells connected to manifolds pose additional challenges for activities related to pipeline cleaning and disconnection/plugging. In this context, the strategy of grouping decommissioning activities and resources emerges as an efficient solution to mitigate operational and environmental risks, increase operational efficiency, avoid rework, and reduce costs associated with decommissioning. Two case studies of subsea systems will be explored in this article, involving production manifolds that have not produced for several years, named manifolds X and Y, both located in a mature production field. This strategy consists of sequentially and integratively grouping well abandonment, pipeline cleaning, and pipeline disconnection/plugging activities, considering the integrity condition of the subsea systems and their interconnection with the floating platform. It is concluded that this strategy can be replicated, accelerating industry learning and contributing to the adoption of best practices in the offshore decommissioning industry in Brazil.

Author Biographies

  • Helton Ivan Menezes Cuevas Beltran, Petrobras

    Graduação (2005) em Engenharia Ambiental pela UNIT. Pós graduação em Engenharia de Segurança do Trabalho (2008) pela FANESE. Pós graduação em Engenharia de Segurança de Processo (2019) pela UNIT. Atuo na PETROBRAS desde 2011. Gerência atual PDP/PROJ-DESC/PROJ-I/DESC-I - Vit´ória-ES. Petrobras, Serra, Espírito Santo, Brasil.

     

  • Márcia Rocha do Valle, Petrobras

    Graduação (2001) em Engenharia Civil pela PUC-Rio. MBA (2005) em Gestão de Negócios pelo IBMEC. Mestrado (2018) em Administração de Empresas pela PUC-Rio e Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Petrobras: PDP/PROJ-DESC/PROJ-I/DESC-II. Petrobras, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil

  • Ludian Anacleto Ferraz, Petrobras

    Graduação (2009) em Engenharia Química pela Universidade Federal de São Carlos - UFSCar. Mestrado (2015) em Energia pela Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo - UFES. MBA (2020) em Gestão de Negócios pela Universidade de São Paulo - USP. Petrobras: AGP/RES-EE/GMP/GMP-AB. Petrobras, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brasil

  • William Nascimento, Petrobras

    Graduação (2020) em Engenharia Mecânica pela Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo - UFES. Pós Graduação em Engenharia Submarina pela Universidade Petrobras (2023). Petrobras: ES/ATP-AB/ISM. Petrobras, Cariacica, Espírito Santo, Brasil.

References

AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DO PETRÓLEO, GÁS NATURAL E BIOCOMBUSTÍVEIS. Resolução nº 817, de 24 de abril de 2020. Brasília, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.in.gov.br/web/dou/-/resolucao-n-817-de-24-de-abril-de-2020-254001378. Acesso em: 23 set. 2025.

NORTH SEA TRANSITION AUTHORITY. Decommissioning Strategy. United Kingdom, 2021. Disponível em: https://www.nstauthority.co.uk/media/7538/decommissioning-strategy- may-2021.pdf. Acesso em: 07 out. 2025.

OFFSHORE ENERGIES UK. Decommissioning Insight 2023. United Kingdom, 2023. Disponível em: https://oeuk.org.uk/product/decommissioning-insight-2023/. Acesso em: 07 out. 2025.

Published

2026-04-30

Issue

Section

Número Especial de Descomissionamento

How to Cite

Beltran, H. I. M. C., do Valle, M. R., Ferraz, L. A., & Nascimento, W. (2026). Case studies of clustering of decommissioning activities for subsea systems with manifolds. Revista Técnica Da Universidade Petrobras , 3, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.70369/a9z2xw30